90NinetyIQ
Back

Head to head

B. Barcola vs Pedri

Two transparent 100-point cases. The same methodology, compared component by component.

Real-data provisional ranking

Every displayed component is computed from current API-Football fixture, event, player-stat, standings, and pre-match Elo evidence. The ranking remains provisional—not illustrative—until the locked 2024–2025 historical holdout gate is complete.

As of 2026-07-26

Rank #26

Bradley Barcola

Paris Saint Germain · Forward

68.5
Individual39.8 / 55
Decisive16.5 / 25
Team12.2 / 20

Rank #3

Pedri

Barcelona · Midfielder

80.8
Individual48.1 / 55
Decisive18.1 / 25
Team14.6 / 20
ComponentB. BarcolaΔPedri
Role output
15.1-0.615.7
Compare the evidence

B. Barcola

Role output is the 84th role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; raw action rates use frozen pre-match field-strength adjustment and ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

Pedri

Role output is the 87th role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; raw action rates use frozen pre-match field-strength adjustment and ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

Creation & progression
9.6-1.811.4
Compare the evidence

B. Barcola

Creation & progression is the 80th role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; raw action rates use frozen pre-match field-strength adjustment and ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

Pedri

Creation & progression is the 95th role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; raw action rates use frozen pre-match field-strength adjustment and ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

All-round role contribution
5.4-3.38.7
Compare the evidence

B. Barcola

All-round role contribution is the 54th role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; raw action rates use frozen pre-match field-strength adjustment and ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

Pedri

All-round role contribution is the 87th role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; raw action rates use frozen pre-match field-strength adjustment and ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

Efficiency & execution
5.5-2.17.6
Compare the evidence

B. Barcola

Efficiency & execution is the 69th role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; raw action rates use frozen pre-match field-strength adjustment and ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

Pedri

Efficiency & execution is the 95th role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; raw action rates use frozen pre-match field-strength adjustment and ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

Availability & consistency
4.2-0.54.7
Compare the evidence

B. Barcola

Availability combines 3213 minutes (58% of team opportunity), 54 appearances, and 40% smooth consistency credit.

60% minutes share + 15% appearance share + 10% start share + 15% smooth 30+ minute match-impact consistency

Pedri

Availability combines 3435 minutes (60% of team opportunity), 49 appearances, and 85% smooth consistency credit.

60% minutes share + 15% appearance share + 10% start share + 15% smooth 30+ minute match-impact consistency

Strong-opposition performance
4.7-0.95.6
Compare the evidence

B. Barcola

Against opponents at or above the 75th pre-match Elo percentile: 22 appearances, 1287 minutes, and 49th role-impact percentile.

80% minutes-weighted role impact + 20% capped 900-minute volume

Pedri

Against opponents at or above the 75th pre-match Elo percentile: 20 appearances, 1504 minutes, and 63rd role-impact percentile.

80% minutes-weighted role impact + 20% capped 900-minute volume

Knockout & final impact
5.7-0.66.3
Compare the evidence

B. Barcola

Knockout credit uses 13 appearances and 717 minutes, weighted by both stage and competition prestige.

75% stage-, prestige-, and minutes-weighted role impact + 25% capped 900-minute prestige volume

Pedri

Knockout credit uses 12 appearances and 708 minutes, weighted by both stage and competition prestige.

75% stage-, prestige-, and minutes-weighted role impact + 25% capped 900-minute prestige volume

Match-swinging contribution
6.1-0.16.2
Compare the evidence

B. Barcola

Match-state events produce 6.73 leverage units from 22 goal/assist/penalty events; untimed role actions in high-uncertainty fixtures add a 89th-percentile proxy.

80% expected-points-added goal/assist leverage (60% volume, 40% rate) + 20% position-specific high-uncertainty action proxy

Pedri

Match-state events produce 4.13 leverage units from 13 goal/assist/penalty events; untimed role actions in high-uncertainty fixtures add a 94th-percentile proxy.

80% expected-points-added goal/assist leverage (60% volume, 40% rate) + 20% position-specific high-uncertainty action proxy

Team performance & achievements
12.2-2.414.6
Compare the evidence

B. Barcola

Team credit: UEFA Champions League winner (0.79 credit); Ligue 1 winner (0.49 credit); FIFA World Cup semi final (0.43 credit). Diminishing-return evidence is 1.22 against the disclosed 2.00 ceiling.

finish × prestige × route × participation × importance; credits then receive 1.0/0.6/0.3/0.1 diminishing weights

Pedri

Team credit: FIFA World Cup winner (1.01 credit); La Liga winner (0.63 credit); UEFA Champions League quarter final (0.19 credit). Diminishing-return evidence is 1.46 against the disclosed 2.00 ceiling.

finish × prestige × route × participation × importance; credits then receive 1.0/0.6/0.3/0.1 diminishing weights

Final index68.580.8