90NinetyIQ
Back

Head to head

Pedri vs L. Yamal

Two transparent 100-point cases. The same methodology, compared component by component.

Real-data provisional ranking

Every displayed component is computed from current API-Football fixture, event, player-stat, standings, and pre-match Elo evidence. The ranking remains provisional—not illustrative—until the locked 2024–2025 historical holdout gate is complete.

As of 2026-07-19

Rank #1

Pedri

Barcelona · Midfielder

82.6
Individual47.3 / 55
Decisive18.2 / 25
Team17.1 / 20

Rank #2

Lamine Yamal

Barcelona · Midfielder

82.3
Individual46.3 / 55
Decisive18.7 / 25
Team17.3 / 20
ComponentPedriΔL. Yamal
Role output
15.5-1.517.0
Compare the evidence

Pedri

Role output is the 86th role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

L. Yamal

Role output is the 94th role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

Creation & progression
11.2+0.111.1
Compare the evidence

Pedri

Creation & progression is the 94th role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

L. Yamal

Creation & progression is the 92th role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

All-round role contribution
8.0+1.46.6
Compare the evidence

Pedri

All-round role contribution is the 80th role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

L. Yamal

All-round role contribution is the 66th role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

Efficiency & execution
7.8+1.46.4
Compare the evidence

Pedri

Efficiency & execution is the 97th role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

L. Yamal

Efficiency & execution is the 80th role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

Availability & consistency
4.8-0.45.2
Compare the evidence

Pedri

Availability combines 3301 minutes (63% of team opportunity), 46 appearances, and 88% above-median performances.

60% minutes share + 15% appearance share + 10% start share + 15% share of 30+ minute matches at or above the role median

L. Yamal

Availability combines 3757 minutes (72% of team opportunity), 46 appearances, and 82% above-median performances.

60% minutes share + 15% appearance share + 10% start share + 15% share of 30+ minute matches at or above the role median

Strong-opposition performance
5.5+0.15.4
Compare the evidence

Pedri

Against opponents at or above the 60th pre-match Elo percentile: 18 appearances, 1255 minutes, and 60th role-impact percentile.

80% minutes-weighted role impact + 20% capped 900-minute volume

L. Yamal

Against opponents at or above the 60th pre-match Elo percentile: 20 appearances, 1787 minutes, and 59th role-impact percentile.

80% minutes-weighted role impact + 20% capped 900-minute volume

Knockout & final impact
6.6+0.16.5
Compare the evidence

Pedri

Knockout credit uses 9 appearances and 574 minutes, weighted from round of 32 through the final.

75% stage-and-minutes-weighted role impact + 25% capped 540-minute volume

L. Yamal

Knockout credit uses 9 appearances and 835 minutes, weighted from round of 32 through the final.

75% stage-and-minutes-weighted role impact + 25% capped 540-minute volume

Match-swinging contribution
6.1-0.76.8
Compare the evidence

Pedri

Match-state events produce 6.35 leverage units from 13 goals/assists/penalty events; role-specific close-match actions add a 93th-percentile signal.

65% score-state goal/assist leverage (60% volume, 40% rate) + 35% position-specific close-match action rate

L. Yamal

Match-state events produce 24.14 leverage units from 38 goals/assists/penalty events; role-specific close-match actions add a 96th-percentile signal.

65% score-state goal/assist leverage (60% volume, 40% rate) + 35% position-specific close-match action rate

Team performance & achievements
17.1-0.217.3
Compare the evidence

Pedri

Team credit: FIFA World Cup winner (1.22 credit); La Liga winner (0.71 credit); UEFA Champions League quarter final (0.22 credit). Diminishing-return evidence is 1.71 against the disclosed 2.00 ceiling.

finish × prestige × route × participation × importance; credits then receive 1.0/0.6/0.3/0.1 diminishing weights

L. Yamal

Team credit: FIFA World Cup winner (1.22 credit); La Liga winner (0.73 credit); UEFA Champions League quarter final (0.24 credit). Diminishing-return evidence is 1.73 against the disclosed 2.00 ceiling.

finish × prestige × route × participation × importance; credits then receive 1.0/0.6/0.3/0.1 diminishing weights

Final index82.682.3