90NinetyIQ
Back

Rank 27 · 2026 race

Elliot Anderson

Nottingham Forest · Scotland · Midfielder

Real-data provisional ranking

Every displayed component is computed from current API-Football fixture, event, player-stat, standings, and pre-match Elo evidence. The ranking remains provisional—not illustrative—until the locked 2024–2025 historical holdout gate is complete.

As of 2026-07-19
65.4

#27 in the index

No change since the previous snapshot

Individual43.0 / 55
Decisive17.0 / 25
Team5.4 / 20

Explanation

Elliot Anderson ranks #27 on 65.4. Availability & consistency is the strongest relative component; Team performance & achievements is the clearest constraint. This temporary deterministic explanation will be replaced by the build-time AI Gateway pass.

Why the rank moved

This is the first real-data snapshot, so no ranking movement is claimed.

Jury context

Football case vs. vote environment.

This research layer estimates visibility and recognition around the journalist ballot. It never changes the player’s 100-point football merit score.

Context

0.0 / 10

Vote forecast

Held

context incomplete

Club visibility

0.0 / 2

Club visibility is unavailable and no vote forecast is published; NinetyIQ does not impute popularity.

League visibility

0.0 / 1.5

League visibility is unavailable and no vote forecast is published; NinetyIQ does not impute popularity.

Recognition & aura

0.0 / 2.5

Recognition & aura is unavailable and no vote forecast is published; NinetyIQ does not impute popularity.

Media momentum

0.0 / 4

Media momentum is unavailable and no vote forecast is published; NinetyIQ does not impute popularity.

Preview formula: 92% merit score + 8% jury context. The 8% is a configurable research hypothesis and must survive the historical holdout before NinetyIQ treats this as a validated forecast.

Score waterfall

Base → nine components → 65.4

Each bar adds its published contribution. The final bar must equal the exact sum of the components or the build fails.

Full decomposition

Every point, in one sentence.

100% data coverage

Role output

Role output is the 68th role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

How this was calculated

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

Source: API-Football embedded player-fixture statistics

Evidence: 46 observations · 100% coverage

key passes per 90

1.338

assists per 90

0.113

accurate passes per 90

38.389

assists

5

API-Football opaque player ratings are excluded.

Rates and totals are compared only within the same position.

12.2 / 18

Creation & progression

Creation & progression is the 77th role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

How this was calculated

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

Source: API-Football embedded player-fixture statistics

Evidence: 46 observations · 100% coverage

key passes per 90

1.338

accurate passes per 90

38.389

assists per 90

0.113

successful dribbles per 90

1.202

API-Football opaque player ratings are excluded.

Rates and totals are compared only within the same position.

9.3 / 12

All-round role contribution

All-round role contribution is the 88th role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

How this was calculated

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

Source: API-Football embedded player-fixture statistics

Evidence: 46 observations · 100% coverage

tackles per 90

2.812

interceptions per 90

1.111

duels won per 90

7.984

duel success

0.556

API-Football opaque player ratings are excluded.

Rates and totals are compared only within the same position.

8.8 / 10

Efficiency & execution

Efficiency & execution is the 76th role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

How this was calculated

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

Source: API-Football embedded player-fixture statistics

Evidence: 46 observations · 100% coverage

pass completion

0.589

duel success

0.556

dribble success

0.546

shot accuracy

0.406

API-Football opaque player ratings are excluded.

Rates and totals are compared only within the same position.

6.1 / 8

Availability & consistency

Availability combines 3968 minutes (95% of team opportunity), 46 appearances, and 80% above-median performances.

How this was calculated

60% minutes share + 15% appearance share + 10% start share + 15% share of 30+ minute matches at or above the role median

Source: API-Football fixture participation and team schedules

Evidence: 46 observations · 100% coverage

minutes

3968 minutes

minutes share

0.952

appearance share

1

consistency share

0.8

Opportunity is the full schedule of every team-competition represented.

6.6 / 7

Strong-opposition performance

Against opponents at or above the 60th pre-match Elo percentile: 24 appearances, 2092 minutes, and 57th role-impact percentile.

How this was calculated

80% minutes-weighted role impact + 20% capped 900-minute volume

Source: API-Football player-fixture statistics plus NinetyIQ leak-free pre-match Elo

Evidence: 24 observations · 100% coverage

strong-opposition matches

24

minutes

2092 minutes

mean role impact

0.57

Opponent strength is frozen before kickoff.

API-Football opaque player ratings are excluded.

5.2 / 8

Knockout & final impact

Knockout credit uses 4 appearances and 375 minutes, weighted from round of 32 through the final.

How this was calculated

75% stage-and-minutes-weighted role impact + 25% capped 540-minute volume

Source: API-Football player-fixture statistics plus NinetyIQ leak-free pre-match Elo

Evidence: 4 observations · 100% coverage

knockout matches

4

minutes

375 minutes

mean role impact

0.519

Opponent strength is frozen before kickoff.

API-Football opaque player ratings are excluded.

6.0 / 10

Match-swinging contribution

Match-state events produce 5.64 leverage units from 9 goals/assists/penalty events; role-specific close-match actions add a 89th-percentile signal.

How this was calculated

65% score-state goal/assist leverage (60% volume, 40% rate) + 35% position-specific close-match action rate

Source: API-Football event timelines and player-fixture statistics

Evidence: 9 observations · 100% coverage

event leverage

5.642

score-changing event actions

9

close-match action percentile

0.891

Equalizers and go-ahead goals receive more credit than score extensions.

API-Football lacks timestamped defensive actions; their close-match rate is a disclosed proxy.

5.8 / 7

Team performance & achievements

Team credit: FIFA World Cup semi final (0.54 credit). Diminishing-return evidence is 0.54 against the disclosed 2.00 ceiling.

How this was calculated

finish × prestige × route × participation × importance; credits then receive 1.0/0.6/0.3/0.1 diminishing weights

Source: API-Football standings, tournament results, player minutes, role impact, and pre-match Elo

Evidence: 2 observations · 100% coverage

FIFA World Cup

0.54

Evidence is normalized to a 2.00 ceiling.

Team success is not awarded equally to every squad member.

5.4 / 20