90NinetyIQ
Back

Rank 16 · 2026 race

Jude Bellingham

Real Madrid · England · Midfielder

Real-data provisional ranking

Every displayed component is computed from current API-Football fixture, event, player-stat, standings, and pre-match Elo evidence. The ranking remains provisional—not illustrative—until the locked 2024–2025 historical holdout gate is complete.

As of 2026-07-19
69.7

#16 in the index

No change since the previous snapshot

Individual45.0 / 55
Decisive17.7 / 25
Team7.0 / 20

Explanation

Jude Bellingham ranks #16 on 69.7. Match-swinging contribution is the strongest relative component; Team performance & achievements is the clearest constraint. This temporary deterministic explanation will be replaced by the build-time AI Gateway pass.

Why the rank moved

This is the first real-data snapshot, so no ranking movement is claimed.

Jury context

Football case vs. vote environment.

This research layer estimates visibility and recognition around the journalist ballot. It never changes the player’s 100-point football merit score.

Context

0.0 / 10

Vote forecast

Held

context incomplete

Club visibility

0.0 / 2

Club visibility is unavailable and no vote forecast is published; NinetyIQ does not impute popularity.

League visibility

0.0 / 1.5

League visibility is unavailable and no vote forecast is published; NinetyIQ does not impute popularity.

Recognition & aura

0.0 / 2.5

Recognition & aura is unavailable and no vote forecast is published; NinetyIQ does not impute popularity.

Media momentum

0.0 / 4

Media momentum is unavailable and no vote forecast is published; NinetyIQ does not impute popularity.

Preview formula: 92% merit score + 8% jury context. The 8% is a configurable research hypothesis and must survive the historical holdout before NinetyIQ treats this as a validated forecast.

Score waterfall

Base → nine components → 69.7

Each bar adds its published contribution. The final bar must equal the exact sum of the components or the build fails.

Full decomposition

Every point, in one sentence.

100% data coverage

Role output

Role output is the 84th role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

How this was calculated

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

Source: API-Football embedded player-fixture statistics

Evidence: 45 observations · 100% coverage

key passes per 90

1.627

assists per 90

0.171

accurate passes per 90

21.472

assists

6

API-Football opaque player ratings are excluded.

Rates and totals are compared only within the same position.

15.2 / 18

Creation & progression

Creation & progression is the 83th role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

How this was calculated

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

Source: API-Football embedded player-fixture statistics

Evidence: 45 observations · 100% coverage

key passes per 90

1.627

accurate passes per 90

21.472

assists per 90

0.171

successful dribbles per 90

1.97

API-Football opaque player ratings are excluded.

Rates and totals are compared only within the same position.

10.0 / 12

All-round role contribution

All-round role contribution is the 81th role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

How this was calculated

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

Source: API-Football embedded player-fixture statistics

Evidence: 45 observations · 100% coverage

tackles per 90

2.398

interceptions per 90

0.657

duels won per 90

8.135

duel success

0.563

API-Football opaque player ratings are excluded.

Rates and totals are compared only within the same position.

8.1 / 10

Efficiency & execution

Efficiency & execution is the 91th role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

How this was calculated

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

Source: API-Football embedded player-fixture statistics

Evidence: 45 observations · 100% coverage

pass completion

0.436

duel success

0.563

dribble success

0.576

shot accuracy

0.662

API-Football opaque player ratings are excluded.

Rates and totals are compared only within the same position.

7.3 / 8

Availability & consistency

Availability combines 3153 minutes (58% of team opportunity), 45 appearances, and 74% above-median performances.

How this was calculated

60% minutes share + 15% appearance share + 10% start share + 15% share of 30+ minute matches at or above the role median

Source: API-Football fixture participation and team schedules

Evidence: 45 observations · 100% coverage

minutes

3153 minutes

minutes share

0.581

appearance share

0.75

consistency share

0.743

Opportunity is the full schedule of every team-competition represented.

4.4 / 7

Strong-opposition performance

Against opponents at or above the 60th pre-match Elo percentile: 17 appearances, 1417 minutes, and 54th role-impact percentile.

How this was calculated

80% minutes-weighted role impact + 20% capped 900-minute volume

Source: API-Football player-fixture statistics plus NinetyIQ leak-free pre-match Elo

Evidence: 17 observations · 100% coverage

strong-opposition matches

17

minutes

1417 minutes

mean role impact

0.543

Opponent strength is frozen before kickoff.

API-Football opaque player ratings are excluded.

5.1 / 8

Knockout & final impact

Knockout credit uses 6 appearances and 512 minutes, weighted from round of 32 through the final.

How this was calculated

75% stage-and-minutes-weighted role impact + 25% capped 540-minute volume

Source: API-Football player-fixture statistics plus NinetyIQ leak-free pre-match Elo

Evidence: 6 observations · 100% coverage

knockout matches

6

minutes

512 minutes

mean role impact

0.472

Opponent strength is frozen before kickoff.

API-Football opaque player ratings are excluded.

6.0 / 10

Match-swinging contribution

Match-state events produce 15.54 leverage units from 21 goals/assists/penalty events; role-specific close-match actions add a 88th-percentile signal.

How this was calculated

65% score-state goal/assist leverage (60% volume, 40% rate) + 35% position-specific close-match action rate

Source: API-Football event timelines and player-fixture statistics

Evidence: 21 observations · 100% coverage

event leverage

15.539

score-changing event actions

21

close-match action percentile

0.877

Equalizers and go-ahead goals receive more credit than score extensions.

API-Football lacks timestamped defensive actions; their close-match rate is a disclosed proxy.

6.6 / 7

Team performance & achievements

Team credit: FIFA World Cup semi final (0.50 credit); La Liga runner up (0.24 credit); UEFA Champions League quarter final (0.19 credit). Diminishing-return evidence is 0.70 against the disclosed 2.00 ceiling.

How this was calculated

finish × prestige × route × participation × importance; credits then receive 1.0/0.6/0.3/0.1 diminishing weights

Source: API-Football standings, tournament results, player minutes, role impact, and pre-match Elo

Evidence: 3 observations · 100% coverage

FIFA World Cup

0.497

La Liga

0.236

UEFA Champions League

0.188

Evidence is normalized to a 2.00 ceiling.

Team success is not awarded equally to every squad member.

7.0 / 20