90NinetyIQ
Back

Rank 11 · 2026 race

Willian Pacho

Paris Saint Germain · Ecuador · Defender

Real-data provisional ranking

Every displayed component is computed from current API-Football fixture, event, player-stat, standings, and pre-match Elo evidence, plus dated official-source individual award records. The locked 2024–2025 vote-forecast holdout is complete but failed its publication thresholds; its experimental ranking is disclosed separately from football merit.

As of 2026-07-31
70.7

#11 in the index

No change since the previous snapshot

Individual33.5 / 55
Decisive20.2 / 25
Team17.0 / 20

Explanation

Willian Pacho: 70.7 merit score. StrongestComponent=Efficiency & execution; limitingComponent=Individual accolades. High execution, availability, and team credit support the score, while official individual honors remain thin.

Why the rank moved

The rank is unchanged at #11. No causal movement claim is made without a prior component decomposition.

Vote forecast context

Football case vs. vote environment.

This research layer estimates visibility and recognition around the journalist ballot. It never changes the player’s 100-point football merit score.

Pre-shortlist watchlist · as of August 18, 2026

Context

11.6 / 30

Vote forecast

48.3

forecast rank #10

Decisive trophy narrative

6.6 / 10

Decisive trophy narrative contributes 6.6 of 10.0 context points: A sourced forecast feature for the biggest team achievement and the player's prominence in that achievement. It deliberately models revealed ballot behavior and never changes football merit.

Empirical position prior

1.0 / 4

Empirical position prior contributes 1.0 of 4.0 context points: A regime-aware coefficient learned from historical voting residuals, never applied to the position-neutral football merit score.

Club & league visibility

4.0 / 4

Club & league visibility contributes 4.0 of 4.0 context points: A historical ballot-visibility prior estimated after controlling for merit, position, and achievements; it is distinct from team quality and competition strength.

Recognition & aura

0.0 / 5

Recognition & aura contributes 0.0 of 5.0 context points: Time-decayed prior Ballon d'Or shortlist, top-ten, podium, and voting recognition; no manual reputation score, follower count, or subjective vibes.

Media momentum

0.0 / 7

Media momentum contributes 0.0 of 7.0 context points: Source-weighted prominence, headline placement, positive candidacy framing, geographic breadth, and recency in audited football journalism; paid promotion, club PR, duplicate stories, and raw social volume are excluded.

The completed historical calibration is published as a failed-holdout experiment: 5% merit, 25% individual output, 20% defensive trophy residual, and 50% jury context produced mean holdout Spearman rho 0.518, below the 0.700 publication threshold. It is available for analysis, not validated. The LLM never supplies a hidden weight. Prediction markets remain an external benchmark, and the LLM cannot add points or move a player. Next scheduled refresh: Oct 12, 2026.

Audited intelligence

Logic and nuance, without hidden points.

Watchlist status; shortlist and market context unavailable.

limited

Shortlist

Watchlist status is noted, but the official shortlist is unavailable in the supplied evidence.

Prediction markets

Market context is unavailable.

The player appears in the supplied NinetyIQ pre-shortlist merit watchlist.[ninetyiq-watchlist-2026-08-12]

Uncertainty

No prediction-market evidence was supplied.

openai/gpt-5.4-mini · ballon-index-explanation-v0.3.2

Score waterfall

Base → ten components → 70.7

Each bar adds its published contribution. The final bar must equal the exact sum of the components or the build fails.

Full decomposition

Every point, in one sentence.

100% data coverage

Role output

Role output is the 67th role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

How this was calculated

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; raw action rates use frozen pre-match field-strength adjustment and ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

Source: API-Football embedded player-fixture statistics

Evidence: 45 observations · 100% coverage

interceptions per 90

1.242

tackles per 90

1.979

duels won per 90

4.561

blocks per 90

0.751

API-Football opaque player ratings are excluded.

Rates and totals are compared only within the same position.

Positive actions receive a disclosed 0.85–1.15 field-strength scalar derived from frozen pre-match Elo.

10.0 / 15

Creation & progression

Creation & progression is the 67th role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

How this was calculated

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; raw action rates use frozen pre-match field-strength adjustment and ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

Source: API-Football embedded player-fixture statistics

Evidence: 45 observations · 100% coverage

accurate passes per 90

73.376

pass completion

0.933

key passes per 90

0.182

successful dribbles per 90

0.076

API-Football opaque player ratings are excluded.

Rates and totals are compared only within the same position.

Positive actions receive a disclosed 0.85–1.15 field-strength scalar derived from frozen pre-match Elo.

6.7 / 10

All-round role contribution

All-round role contribution is the 71st role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

How this was calculated

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; raw action rates use frozen pre-match field-strength adjustment and ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

Source: API-Football embedded player-fixture statistics

Evidence: 45 observations · 100% coverage

interceptions per 90

1.242

tackles per 90

1.979

duels won per 90

4.561

blocks per 90

0.751

API-Football opaque player ratings are excluded.

Rates and totals are compared only within the same position.

Positive actions receive a disclosed 0.85–1.15 field-strength scalar derived from frozen pre-match Elo.

5.7 / 8

Efficiency & execution

Efficiency & execution is the 92nd role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

How this was calculated

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; raw action rates use frozen pre-match field-strength adjustment and ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

Source: API-Football embedded player-fixture statistics

Evidence: 45 observations · 100% coverage

duel success

0.631

pass completion

0.933

dribble success

0.569

discipline

1

API-Football opaque player ratings are excluded.

Rates and totals are compared only within the same position.

Positive actions receive a disclosed 0.85–1.15 field-strength scalar derived from frozen pre-match Elo.

6.5 / 7

Availability & consistency

Availability combines 3899 minutes (76% of team opportunity), 45 appearances, and 80% smooth consistency credit.

How this was calculated

60% minutes share + 15% appearance share + 10% start share + 15% smooth 30+ minute match-impact consistency

Source: API-Football fixture participation and team schedules

Evidence: 45 observations · 100% coverage

minutes

3899 minutes

minutes share

0.756

appearance share

0.789

consistency share

0.797

Opportunity is calculated within each represented team-season-competition.

Consistency uses unshrunk match impact and a smooth 0.40–0.60 credit curve instead of a noisy hard threshold.

3.8 / 5

Individual accolades

Verified individual honors: Official Team of the Season or Tournament selection (0.75). Tier caps convert 0.75 direct points to 0.75 of 10.0.

How this was calculated

published direct award points; sum within competition tier, apply the tier cap, sum tiers, then apply the 10-point component cap

Source: Official FIFA, confederation, UEFA, league, and players-union award records

Evidence: 1 observations · 100% coverage

Official Team of the Season or Tournament selection

0.75

Official source ↗

Uncapped direct points: 0.75.

Tier credits after overlap caps: National league 0.75.

Final accolade component: 0.75/10.0.

An absent official award is scored as zero; the LLM cannot add or alter honors.

0.8 / 10

Strong-opposition performance

Against opponents at or above the 75th pre-match Elo percentile: 23 appearances, 2013 minutes, and 60th role-impact percentile.

How this was calculated

85% minutes-weighted role impact + 15% capped 900-minute volume

Source: API-Football player-fixture statistics plus NinetyIQ leak-free pre-match Elo

Evidence: 23 observations · 100% coverage

strong-opposition matches

23

minutes

2013 minutes

mean role impact

0.599

Opponent strength is frozen before kickoff.

API-Football opaque player ratings are excluded.

3.3 / 5

Knockout & final impact

Knockout credit combines 0.08 event-leverage units from 1 goal/assist/penalty event with 11 appearances and 994 minutes.

How this was calculated

70% stage- and prestige-weighted event leverage + 25% stage-, prestige-, and minutes-weighted role impact + 5% capped 900-minute prestige volume

Source: API-Football event timelines and player-fixture statistics plus NinetyIQ leak-free pre-match Elo

Evidence: 11 observations · 100% coverage

knockout matches

11

minutes

994 minutes

knockout event leverage

0.077

mean role impact

0.587

Knockout minutes contribute only 5% of this signal.

Event leverage is adjusted for score state, match clock, knockout stage, competition prestige, and opponent strength.

API-Football opaque player ratings are excluded.

6.8 / 8

Match-swinging contribution

Match-state events produce 1.01 leverage units from 3 goal/assist/penalty events; the score uses verified event leverage without a generalized role-output proxy.

How this was calculated

100% expected-points-added goal/assist leverage (65% volume, 35% rate); generalized role output receives no match-swing credit

Source: API-Football event timelines and player-fixture statistics

Evidence: 3 observations · 100% coverage

event leverage

1.008

score-changing event actions

3

Goal leverage is the change in expected points from frozen pre-match Elo, live score, and match clock.

Untimed generalized role actions are excluded from this component.

10.1 / 12

Team performance & achievements

Team credit: UEFA Champions League winner (1.33 credit); Ligue 1 winner (0.62 credit). Diminishing-return evidence is 1.70 against the disclosed 2.00 ceiling.

How this was calculated

finish × prestige × route × participation × importance; credits then receive 1.0/0.6/0.3/0.1 diminishing weights

Source: API-Football standings, tournament results, player minutes, role impact, and pre-match Elo

Evidence: 4 observations · 100% coverage

UEFA Champions League

1.333

Ligue 1

0.62

Evidence is normalized to a 2.00 ceiling.

Team success is not awarded equally to every squad member.

Starting semi-finals and finals increases importance; bench status therefore reduces trophy credit.

17.0 / 20